Your Ad Here
Showing posts with label Chevrolet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chevrolet. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Chevrolet model hits Kerala roads

Kochi, Nov 16(UNI) Bookmark and Share

General Motors today launched its new car, Chevrolet Sail-U-VA hatchback on Kerala roads.

General Motors India President and Managing Director Lowell Paddock said 'the much anticipated Chevrolet Sail U-VA hatchback is an important addition to GM's small car portfolio in India.

It brings a new sense of vitality to the largest, fastest-growing and most competitive segment in the domestic passenger car market.' Expressing the hope that the company would sell about 4000 units a months, he said as many as 250 units would sell in Kearla.

Claiming that the demand for GMs car was increasing in each year, he said the company had sold 38251 units in 2011 as against just 11777 unites during 2008. However, the company achieved a total sale of 50000 units as on date, he added.

--UNI

View the original article here

Monday, August 15, 2011

We Poke and Prod a 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Interior and Find Lots of Squish and Understated Splash

Chevrolet pulled the sheets off of its 2013 Malibu sedan at this past April’s New York auto show, but it wasn’t until yesterday that we were able to examine the car’s insides. Chevrolet had previously supplied a few press shots of the interior, and the production-intent version is largely the same, with the placement of a few buttons being the only significant change. Our first impressions of the final interior design and materials are positive.

Relative to the current-gen Malibu (one was on hand at the press event), the shapes and forms flow together more cohesively and it’s a little more geometric in design. The window sills and upper portions of the doors and dashboard are crafted from nicely grained soft-touch material, while the padded armrests and styled door inserts come in stitched leather or cloth—the final coverings weren’t on hand for our judgment, however. As for spaciousness, the 2013 Malibu’s rear-seat legroom does seem to have taken a hit relative to the current model’s as a result of the 2013 ‘Bu’s 4.5-inch reduction in wheelbase, but it’s still fairly roomy.

The fake wood lining the armrests, center stack, and steering wheel is rendered in what Chevy calls a “more modern” pattern, eschewing traditional wood graining and burling, but it really just looks like faux zebra hide slathered in several coats of shellac. It’s the only major misstep, and is standard on LT and LTZ trims; only the base LS is spared. A Chevy representative acknowledged that the design team would have preferred a low-gloss finish, but customer feedback indicated Malibu buyers liked shiny better. Too bad.

Moving beyond the chintzy “wood,” the Malibu’s interior features classy, blue ambient lighting and sparingly applied chromed plastic. The plastics are all nicely finished, and panel gaps are tight and consistent—bearing in mind that these were specially prepped prototypes—and the switchgear moved with well-damped precision. The Chevrolet MyLink touch screen had sharp graphics and a quick-reacting interface, and a brief demo showed that it appears to be much more straightforward than Ford’s fussy MyFord Touch system.

Chevrolet laid out what to expect from the three trim levels at launch, and even the base LS interior is rather attractive, despite being available only in basic black. The LT and LTZ trims will offer three interior color schemes paired with the simulated wood; the LT offers the choice of leather upholstery or cloth seats with vinyl bolsters, while the LTZ is leather only. If you order a Malibu LT or LTZ with what Chevy calls a “fashion” color scheme, your leather seats get snazzy contrasting piping like the car in our photos. The 2013 Malibu will go on sale early next year, by which point we should be able to report whether we like driving the car as much as we did sitting in it.


View the original article here

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

2012 Chevrolet Sonic – First Drive Review

2012 Chevrolet Sonic First Drive – Review – Car and Drive #pallet {margin:0;}#echoice li.category {margin:0;}Car and DriverIntelligence. Independence. Irreverence. VehiclesReviewsNewsFeaturesBuyer's GuideFollow UsSubscribeSearch Car and DriverHome › Reviews › 2012 Chevrolet Sonic - First Drive Review

Shopping Tools

Advertisement

2012 Chevrolet Sonic - First Drive ReviewChevy’s new entry in the revived economy-car segment shows some serious promise.BY MICHAEL AUSTIN
May 2011

Pages:1Photos

2012 Chevrolet Sonic

Photos (28)Visit Our Buyer's Guide »ChevroletNews & Reviews2012 Chevrolet Sonic - Video2012 Chevrolet Sonic Official Photos and Info - Auto ShowsTop CompetitorsFord Fiesta hatchbackHonda FitMazda 2Nissan Versa 5-door hatchbackToyota Yaris 5-door Liftback

In the subcompact market, things like standard aluminum wheels are big news. Guess what? The 2012 Chevrolet Sonic has standard aluminum wheels. Honestly, we really like that. But in bigger news, Chevy’s forthcoming econobox is actually fun to drive. This is an about-face compared with the outgoing Aveo, which traded exclusively on its bargain-basement price. The Sonic, on sale this fall, seeks to recruit buyers with quality, features, and—to borrow a phrase overused by German car companies—driving pleasure.

A brief disclaimer: Our driving exposure was limited to preproduction prototypes in one configuration (1.4-liter turbo, manual transmission, five-door) on an improvised circuit at Lucas Oil Raceway in Indianapolis, Indiana. In other words, we won’t be able to give you a definitive review until we get more time in a finished production car. But so far the worst thing about Chevy’s new subcompact is the Sonic name. There isn’t much wrong with the actual word, but so many other items in popular culture (fast-food drive-ins, video-game hedgehogs, Seattle’s former basketball team) come more readily to mind than “affordable American car.”

Plenty to Like

Aside from that, there is much to like about the Sonic, most notably the turbocharged 1.4-liter engine we sampled. Shared with the Cruze, the turbo four makes 138 hp and 148 lb-ft of torque, 18 hp and 26 lb-ft more than the Ford Fiesta, a clear rival. And when paired with a six-speed manual, Chevrolet promises a 40-mpg highway fuel-economy rating for the Sonic turbo. The other engine (also sourced from the Cruze) is a naturally aspirated 1.8-liter making the same 138 hp but with a reduced torque figure of 125 lb-ft. The Sonic has slightly different gearing and weighs about 400 fewer pounds than the Cruze, so we expect better acceleration and fuel economy across the board. (In a recent comparison test, an automatic-equipped 1.4T Cruze posted an 8.0-second 0-to-60-mph run.)

The Sonic’s turbo pulls well above 3000 rpm; there is noticeable lag at lower engine speeds, despite a low torque peak of 1850 rpm. Still, it’s a strong, smooth engine. This is not the second coming of the Volkswagen GTI, but the Sonic turbo injects some serious fun in a segment that usually puts performance on the back burner. Chevrolet had a Honda Fit and a Ford Fiesta on hand for comparison, and the Sonic held up well. In lap times, all the drivers present went almost two seconds quicker in the Sonic than in the next-fastest Fit, but some of that is surely due to superior acceleration at higher speeds. The Honda, which is geared shorter, feels better at low engine speeds. And the Ford offers less body roll. But the Sonic looks as though it would acquit itself nicely against the Fit and Fiesta, as well as the Mazda 2. The Chevy’s steering is light and reacts quickly on turn-in. Handling eventually gives way to understeer (the Honda can be tossed around more), but up to the limit the Sonic is responsive and behaves predictably even under trail braking. We’d like a little more feel in the shift lever, but it’s acceptable for this price point.

Should Be Practical and Affordable

The Sonic is an economy car, which means sacrifices in creature comforts. The rear seats don’t have an armrest or cup holders, but they are acceptably habitable even behind a six-plus-footer in the driving position. Both Sonic sedan and hatchback share the same 99.4-inch wheelbase. The four-door, at 173.1 inches, is 14.1 inches longer than the hatch but loses in the space race with 14 cubic feet of trunk space to the hatch’s 19. The hatch also has slightly better rear-seat headroom. The cargo area in the five-door, although not as spacious or ingenious as the Honda Fit’s, has a removable false floor that creates a level surface when the seats are folded. There is also a slot for the cargo cover to slide into behind the rear seats.

Chevrolet won’t divulge Sonic pricing until the fall on-sale date gets closer, only hinting that it will be competitive in the segment. We take to that to mean a starting price of about $14,000 and, as is the case with Fiesta and Fit, loftier trim models (including the turbo) that run as high as $19,000. Also like the Fiesta, we’re guessing the Sonic hatch will command a premium for its more attractive looks, although we have to say that the Sonic sedan manages to look something less than dumpy—a huge achievement in this segment. Even in base LS trim, the Sonic comes with the aforementioned wheels, plus air conditioning, power locks, keyless entry, stability control, and an impressive 10 air bags.

We’re not quite ready to break out the “super” prefix for the Sonic, but it does appear to mark the return of the American small car, and not just in name. As part of GM’s restructuring, the Sonic will be assembled in Lake Orion, Michigan. The good news for Chevy, however, is that the Sonic appeals on its merits as a car and not as a piece of flag-waving patriotism.

Specifications

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan or 5-door wagon

ESTIMATED BASE PRICE: $14,000

ENGINES: DOHC 16-valve 1.8-liter inline-4, 138 hp, 125 lb-ft; turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve 1.4-liter inline-4, 138 hp, 148 lb-ft

TRANSMISSIONS: 6-speed automatic with manual shifting mode, 5- or 6-speed manual

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 99.4 in Length: 159.0–173.2 in
Width: 68.3 in Height: 59.7 in
Curb weight (C/D est): 2800 lb

PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 7.9–9.0 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 16.1–17.0 sec
Top speed: 124 mph

FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST):
EPA city/highway driving: 27–28/36–40 mpg

 
Shell

Subscribe to Car and Driver magazine

Pages:1Photos

Stumble ItYahoo! BuzzRelated Stories »2011 Ford Fiesta vs. 2010 Honda Fit, 2011 Mazda 2 - Comparison TestsEgo Shrinkers: Will Americans ever be able to accept a driving life in a confined but economical package?

Chevrolet Announces Z-Spec Accessories, Halftone Dots for 2012 Sonic2012 Chevrolet Sonic Official Photos and Info - Auto ShowsChevy is awful proud of its Aveo replacement, the new Sonic.

Cars Versus Similarly Named Stuff: Round 3 - FeatureWhat happens when vehicles take on people, places, and things with similar names?

The 25 Hours of Thunderhill in a B-spec Mazda 2 and Honda Fit - FeatureKiller Bs: We find fun—and even success—racing a Honda Fit and a Mazda 2.

2011 Mazda 2 - Long-Term Road Test IntroWe add Mazda’s cheapest Zoom-Zoom product to our stable of long-termers.

Car and Driver Video »CD VideoThis Month in Car and Driver »In This Months Issue of Car and Driver DirectoryM Local Guides Subscribe Vehicles Trucks, SUVs, & Vans Sporty & Fun Sedans & Wagons Luxury Budget & Green Editor's Choice Most Researched Reviews In the Magazine From the Archives Comparison Tests Road Tests First Drives News Auto Shows Spy Photos Car News Car and Driver Blog Features Gear Box Interviews Tech Department Sport Awards Columns Features Buyer's Guide Editor's Choice: Trucks, SUVs, & Vans Editor's Choice: Sporty & Fun Editor's Choice: Sedans & Wagons Editor's Choice: Luxury Editor's Choice: Budget & Green Follow us Car and Driver RSS Car and Driver on Twitter Car and Driver on YouTube Car and Driver on Facebook Backfires Subscribe Mobile Digital Edition Newsletter Subscriptions Sitemap Contact Us Browse Cars for Sale Subscriptions/Customer Service Website Feedback Best Cars Luxury Cars Sports Cars Trucks Hybrids YouTube Twitter FacebookHFMU.S. Mens Network

Visit other Hachette Filipacchi sites:

Cycle World ELLE ELLEgirl ELLE DECOR Glo Premiere Road & Track Woman's DayCopyright ©2010 Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., Inc., Terms & Conditions Privacy-Your Privacy Rights


View the original article here

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Name That Exhaust Note, Episode 91: 2011 Chevrolet Camaro V-6

June 2, 2011 at 4:00pm by Car and Driver

Name That Exhaust Note Episode 91

On Tuesday, we posted an audio recording of a mystery car’s exhaust note. To hear it again, click play above. This week’s exhaust note proved tricky, and most everyone who commented guessed that it came from a Nissan 370Z. This week’s sound came from the 2011 Chevrolet Camaro V-6.

Like that sound? Download the MP3 and quiz your friends, make your own ringtone, or just lull yourself to sleep with sweet, sweet vehicular ear candy.

2011 Chevrolet Camaro V-6 MP3 (Right-click to Save As…)

Tags: Chevrolet Camaro V6, Name That Exhaust Note |


View the original article here

Sunday, June 5, 2011

2011 Chevrolet Volt, an AW Drivers Log Car Review:

EXECUTIVE EDITOR ROGER HART: Getting into the 2011 Chevrolet Volt here at the office, the display showed a 71 percent charge that was good for about 15 miles. After that, the gasoline engine switched on and carried me the rest of the way home.

I plugged the car in inside my 55-degree garage and charged it overnight. Initially, the display said a full charge would happen by 4:30 a.m., and then it went to 9 a.m. When I left the house at 7 this morning, the display showed 91 percent battery, good for 26 miles. It seems as if the Volt battery pack does not really like cold weather, plus you have to run the heater, the wipers, etc.

While I can certainly appreciate all of the technology that has gone into the Chevy Volt, and it really is impressive, all things considered, you don't have to spend much time in this to realize it's certainly not for everyone. It is an extremely expensive commuter car, with room for four people. I appreciate General Motors getting out in front and doing an extended range electric, and from that standpoint it's a cool vehicle. But it's really nothing special to drive, the hard, low-rolling-resistance tires are not the most compliant, and the interior comfort isn't much better than that of the Chevy Malibu. Actually, not sure how the heating and cooling system works, but the temperature set on the controls would seem to be just an approximation. I had it set to 75 and was freezing.

Anyway, this car has a limited audience, to be sure. For around town errands, it's probably terrific. No need to buy any gasoline. But from our limited tests, a full charge will get in the neighborhood of 30 miles, and all things considered, that's not a whole lot.

EXECUTIVE EDITOR--AUTOWEEK.COM BOB GRITZINGER: For buyers in four-season climates with specific, short (20-miles round-trip) daily commutes who want to be on the cutting edge of transportation technology, the Chevrolet Volt is your poster car.

The car is really an engineering marvel that works well, changing the game to electric power from using internal combustion as primary motivation. And it does it with considerable style, given that the underlying chassis is a humble yet capable Chevrolet Cruze. For those familiar with the typically Spartan interiors in eco models, the Volt interior is top-shelf, especially in this upper-crust version. The appliance-white center stack trim (some have likened it to an iPod face) is replaced with a much more handsome darker trim, and the seats, steering wheel and other surfaces are all well done. This red paint job also wears well on the car.

What is kind of surprising, considering the hype surrounding the Volt, is just how normal it is to drive. Yes, it's a tad heavy in the corners because of the battery load. And here and there, the engine winds up in ways that are completely disconnected from the accelerator pedal. But most of the time, you have to be a car geek who is really listening for it, otherwise you'll never notice. Play the radio and you won't hear the engine, ever. The power is strong, smooth and steady-state refined in a way that most drivers will find quite impressive for a car that otherwise would be driven by a small-displacement engine tied down by an automatic transmission. Punch up Sport mode, shift into “L,” and the car becomes truly sporty in drive character.

Living with the Volt for few days revealed some of the real-world issues that an owner would face on a regular basis, not the least of which is plugging the car in every day. Sounds simple, and for buyers who upgrade to a 220-volt outlet in their garage, it would be easier because the cord would be there at the ready at all times. But I could see it becoming a pain for those who opt for standard household current, what with the bother of getting out the charging cord from its stowage under the rear cargo floor, unwinding it, plugging it in at both ends (and making sure no one launches a blow dryer on the same circuit!), and then reversing the process each morning before you drive away.

Inevitably, the Volt power cord gathers gunk and dirt from your garage floor, so you have to remember to unplug and pack up the wiring before you're dressed and ready to go to work, for instance. Some might say, “What's the big deal?” But after charging via household 110-volt outlets for a few days, I can attest that the novelty soon wears off. It starts to make stopping at a gas pump seem simple by comparison.

The novelty is further degraded when an overnight nine- or 10-hour charge in a 45-degree garage only results in a 90 percent charge, equating to somewhere between 20 miles and 26 miles of driving distance with an ambient temperature in the 40s. I can imagine that Volt owners in colder climates might just pump gasoline instead of fighting for the kilowatts on a daily basis.

For now, the Chevrolet Volt has be viewed through the same lens as any whiz-bang new technology, be it the latest smartphone, tablet reader, computer, TV or Weedwacker. The price of entry is high for early adopters, but as the technology proliferates, the cost comes down for the rest of us plodders who would rather wait to make sure the latest technology has staying power. Here's one vote saying this approach to transportation will be around for a long time.

EDITOR WES RAYNAL: I averaged about seven miles of juice on each two-hour charge over the weekend. I couldn't charge it overnight because the car stuck out the back of my garage and I didn't want to leave my garage door open all night. I'd go for the 220-volt outlet in my garage if this was my car. That, and we should drive one this summer to see whether it charges quicker and whether it goes further than 20-something miles on a full charge.

As for the driving, the transition between all electric power and running on the generator is seamless. You just press the start button, select D on the transmission and go. It's refined, and all you can hear is a quiet whine and whirr from the electric motor.

It doesn't feel quite as quick as the claimed 9.0-second 0-to-60-mph time, but it does pull away strongly and seamlessly from a stop. I thought the car rode and handled well, better than I thought it would. I was worried it would drive heavier than it did. I'd much rather drive this everyday than a Toyota Prius, that's for sure.

I agree that some version of this could well be the powertrain of the future. I wonder why this car needs such a big engine if it's only going to act as a generator. Perhaps the next one could be a small two-cylinder unit, or I've heard talk of a small turbine or rotary engine.

NEWS EDITOR GREG MIGLIORE: “Drive it like a regular car,” the keeper of the keys said as I was tossed the set to the Chevy Volt for a night. That was pretty much my only option, as my suburban bachelor pad is a good distance from the downtown Detroit digs of One AutoWeek Tower.

But nevertheless, I was excited, sort of like getting a new iPhone, when I unhooked the power cable and set sail for the suburbs. The charge meter said I had 26 miles of electricity, which got me almost exactly home, the screen indicating one mile of range when I coasted into my apartment parking lot.

That meant the ride back in was exclusively on the power of the Ecotec four-banger, as I had no practical way of charging the Volt overnight. No worries, though. This Chevy is the embodiment of new and different technology, and I consumed less than half of the amount of fuel I would have normally used.

The power is respectable when in electric mode, and passing is not a huge chore. This is by no means a fast car, but it's not dog-slow, either. In conventional mode, the Volt is still decent, but I found myself flooring it to fill gaps and build speed for maneuvers.

The steering has a nice weight to it at higher speeds, and is appropriately lighter during slower movement. The chassis is reasonably comfortable, too. Really, the regen brakes are the only interactive driver element that stand out, as they are heavy and demand a bit of pedal travel.

Inside, the Volt looks futuristic and worthy of the heady sticker. Really, Chevy had to dress up the interior or risk having its most important technological accomplishment in recent memory come across as inexpensive. But fear not, the buttons have a very modern feel, the door panels are gorgeous and the touch screen is among the best I've used. All of the information can be reasonably comprehended after a short time in the car, and it's smart and intuitive. The seats were comfortable. I found a nice driving position quickly, and the back seat offered ample legroom and headroom for a man of average build. I liked the four-seat configuration. It felt sporty, and really, who wants to sit in the middle?

I liked the sheetmetal, but the Chevrolet Volt doesn't really stand out. The taillights and blacked-out roof are cool styling cues, and the wheels and side trim look upscale. I would say the silhouette is a bit chunky, but it looks better than a Nissan Leaf or a Toyota Prius to my eye.

General Motors did exactly what it said it would with the Volt. I came away impressed with the execution. The biggest flaw is the drive character does not stand out. At times, you could just as easily be in a heavier version of the Chevy Cruze. Mainstream consumers and early adopters will like the Volt. Alas, enthusiasts will not find their passions aroused.

AUTOWEEK.COM EDITOR DALE JEWETT: OK, so I thought I could be the poster-child commuter for the Volt. The trip from the office to the family compound is only about 13 miles. I left the office with a fully charged battery pack and stated electric range of 28 miles. So I didn't even bother to look at the status of the gas gauge.

But I hadn't traveled even one mile from the parking garage before the battery indicator showed that 10 percent of the charge was already gone! And I thought I was being pretty good--no radio, no seat heaters, easy on the throttle and brake. And another 10 percent was gone before I'd racked up three miles on the trip.

Then things settled down. The flow of rush-hour traffic let me maintain a pretty steady pace of about 45 mph and also let me see braking events developing and let me keep the powertrain in regen mode as much as I could. So when I reached Casa de Jewett, the readout said I still had 12 miles of electric range left. That was good enough to make a run for some takeout and get back home without burning any petrol and two bars lit on the battery gauge.

The Volt spent the night charging in the garage. I plugged it in to the standard outlet at about 8:30 p.m., and by 6:30 a.m., the blinking green light on the dash said the pack was all charged up and ready to go. I even used the remote “start” function on the key fob to get the interior preheated while the Volt was still plugged in--and I didn't have to worry about going out and opening the garage door to vent any exhaust.

The full battery gave me a range of 28 miles, the readout said as I rolled out of the garage. That would be plenty for the drive back to work.

But the Chevy Volt is a hot property. Mrs. J asked if I could swing by her office since her boss has been jonesing for one since they were announced. Well, of course. So, 9 miles of stop-and-go driving got me to her office and left 18 miles on the range gauge. I spent 15 minutes showing off the car--doors, hood and hatch open, passing around the charging cord, playing musical chairs in the driver seat. Then, let's take the boss for a short drive. He liked it --“just like a regular car,” he said. And he was a big fan of the thrust when I nailed the throttle. “And much better than my Ram on gas,” he added. The Volt easily blended in with other cars on the road. And the interior layout and materials make you feel right at home, regardless of what you've been driving for the past five years.

OK, maybe there's a raise--or a free lunch--for Mrs. J.

But now the range gauge was down to 10 miles. That might just make it--but the shortest route to the office is also the most congested. So I opted for the longer but less congested route. It starts with a six-mile stint on the freeway. Man, rolling along at 70 mph really drains the battery pack. Getting off the freeway and onto the usual surface route, I had only two miles left on the range gauge. I nursed it for three miles, then the engine kicked in--quite seamlessly, I note.

So I managed 26 miles on the battery pack, but had to dip into the fuel tank to finish the run to the office. But tonight's driver should leave here on a full battery pack.

The Volt is a fine driver. The chassis is solid and the suspension handles the bumps with a luxury-like thump.

The lack of engine noise means you can hear plenty of tire noise, suspension noise and ambient noise from the traffic around you. The noise factor seems loudest coming from the rear seats and the hatch area of the car. But I'm a fan of convertibles, so road and tire noise is music to me. And for most drivers, they'll just turn up the satellite radio to compensate (I purposely left it off to evaluate the noise level.)

For many people, on many days, the Chevy Volt will need only battery power. It was interesting to note that the car is programmed to run the engine at least once a month for maintenance purposes. And it tracks your fuel use--if you don't burn off a tank of fuel within a year, it will run the engine to burn the gasoline before it gets stale.

But I think that having the Volt as your daily driver wouldn't be much different than having a Toyota or Ford hybrid. And I don't see any advantage to taking this car on a long trip.

Without the electric drive system, what you have is a really expensive Cruze.

MOTORSPORTS EDITOR MAC MORRISON: Finally, a taste of the Chevrolet Volt, and I enjoyed it. The battery gauge claimed 26 miles when I climbed aboard, but as others mentioned, the gauge drops by a few miles almost immediately once you start to drive. I made it about 23 miles and change before running out of juice. That was almost enough to get me home from the office. I'll tell you what, there are plenty of work days when I wouldn't have to burn any, or maybe just a tiny little bit, of gasoline.

The car is incredibly quiet running on either electric or gasoline power, and the direct drive is a little bizarre when you are used to conventional transmissions or even less conventional designs such as a CVT. This is like driving a real-life slot car in that sense.

The transition from electric to gasoline, as mentioned, is imperceptible, unlike the lurch you feel in many hybrid automobiles. I also found this car more pleasant and rewarding to drive than some of those others, notably the last Prius that I drove.

Dale makes an interesting point, that this is just a technologically (and price)-enhanced Cruze, but I like the exterior and the interior is slick, with Camaro-esque, color-coordinated door panels, a very cool dashboard design and nice switchgear.

I definitely look forward to a more extended drive in the Volt, but my first impression is that it's a great first-gen effort at changing the way some cars are powered.

ASSOCIATE EDITOR JONATHAN WONG: My esteemed colleagues more or less covered everything about this Chevrolet Volt. From a technology standpoint, this is quite the marvel. With a full charge to the battery, I hit the expressway toward Ann Arbor from downtown Detroit and cruised along at about 75 mph. Dale is correct that battery drains at an alarming rate at those speeds. The flow of traffic was steady as I rode along in the left lane, and I managed 26 miles before the gasoline engine virtually unnoticeably came to life.

It's true that this car is just a regular car. It has a comfortable ride and handles fairly well. Someone above mentioned tire noise, which isn't a surprise with the low-rolling-resistance tires. Those tires also were quick to squeal around corners when you tried to push the Volt some. Steering feel and response are OK, and the brake pedal offers a decent amount of modulation.

On pure electric, the Volt gets up and goes with ease. The lack of an engine note when you accelerate beyond 60 mph takes getting used to, but the smoothness of the powertrain really needs to be applauded here.

Visually, the car sports the aerodynamic wedge shape which isn't a surprise. It looks pretty good to my eye and the interior layout is attractive and functional. All of the different screens available to you for various readouts for range, battery charge, fuel and etc. will take a bit figure out, but they should become second nature to run through for owners. Nothing is overly complicated, which is good.

The price is still a sticking point here. For a vehicle like the Volt to truly make sense, the price of the technology needs to come down and battery technology still needs to improve to offer better range on pure electric power. All of that will come in time, but the Chevy Volt is a much better starting point than I thought it would be.

2011 Chevrolet Volt

Base Price: $41,000

As-Tested Price: $43,485

Drivetrain: 111-kW electric motor, 1.4-liter I4; FWD, two-mode electric drive system

Output: 149-hp, 273-lb-ft electric motor (84 hp @ 4,800 gasoline engine)

Curb Weight: 3,781 lb

Fuel Economy (EPA): 93 mpg-e all electric/37 mpg gasoline only/60 mpg-e combined composite

AW Observed Fuel Economy: 59.8 mpg

Options: Premium trim package including leather-appointed seating, premium door trim, heated front seats, leather-wrapped steering wheel ($1,395); 17-inch forged wheels ($595); crystal red metallic tintcoat paint ($495)


AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Critique statements or articles, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. Above all, be respectful. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Email moderator@autoweek.com

View the original article here

Thursday, May 19, 2011

2011 Chevrolet Cruze LT vs. 2012 Ford Focus SEL, 2011 Hyundai Elantra Limited, 2011 Mazda 3 s Sport, 2011 Volkswagen Jetta 2.5 SEL – Comparison Tests

April 29, 2011 at 11:16am by Jared Gall

Mazda 3 s Sport, 2011 Volkswagen Jetta 2.5 SEL2012 Ford Focus SEL

Startup Sedans: Five perfectly respectable rides for up-and-comers establish a new standard for compact sedans.

Even if two weeks’ worth of Maruchan ramen drains your savings account, there’s something about a rusting mid-’90s Accord on sagging springs that fails to inspire confidence among financial backers or real-estate agents. And when you and the missus are just starting out, you feel that need to be taken seriously more acutely than most. There are certainly cheaper new cars than the group gathered here, but—wrong as it may be—“cheap” is the only reputation many B-segment cars have.

Keep Reading: 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LT vs. 2012 Ford Focus SEL, 2011 Hyundai Elantra Limited, 2011 Mazda 3 s Sport, 2011 Volkswagen Jetta 2.5 SEL – Comparison Tests

Tags: American, Chevrolet, Chevrolet Cruze, economy, Ford, Ford Focus, Hyundai, Hyundai Elantra, Japanese, Korean, Mazda, Mazda 3, performance testing, sedan, Volkswagen, Volkswagen Jetta |


View the original article here

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

2013 Chevrolet Malibu @ 2011 New York Auto Show – Video

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

2012 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 / ZR1 – Car News

April 28, 2011 at 9:37pm by Steve Siler

2012 Chevrolet Corvette Centennial Edition

Grippier tires and—finally!—grippier seats mark the C6’s last full year of production.

Regular (and even irregular) readers already know this, so for those who are unfamiliar with this institution, an introduction: Hi, we’re Car and Driver, and we hate the seats in the Corvette. Today, Chevy’s plastic fantastic isn’t so much a sports car as it is a budget supercar. But, in our every encounter with it, we come away just as appalled at its seats as we are amazed at its capabilities.

Keep Reading: 2012 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 / ZR1 – Car News

Tags: American, Chevrolet, Chevrolet Corvette, Chevrolet Corvette Z06, Chevrolet Corvette ZR1, coupe, sports car, supercharged |


View the original article here

Friday, May 13, 2011

2011 Chevrolet Cruze LT vs. 2012 Ford Focus SEL, 2011 Hyundai Elantra Limited, 2011 Mazda 3 s Sport, 2011 Volkswagen Jetta 2.5 SEL – Comparison Tests

April 29, 2011 at 11:16am by Jared Gall

Mazda 3 s Sport, 2011 Volkswagen Jetta 2.5 SEL2012 Ford Focus SEL

Startup Sedans: Five perfectly respectable rides for up-and-comers establish a new standard for compact sedans.

Even if two weeks’ worth of Maruchan ramen drains your savings account, there’s something about a rusting mid-’90s Accord on sagging springs that fails to inspire confidence among financial backers or real-estate agents. And when you and the missus are just starting out, you feel that need to be taken seriously more acutely than most. There are certainly cheaper new cars than the group gathered here, but—wrong as it may be—“cheap” is the only reputation many B-segment cars have.

Keep Reading: 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LT vs. 2012 Ford Focus SEL, 2011 Hyundai Elantra Limited, 2011 Mazda 3 s Sport, 2011 Volkswagen Jetta 2.5 SEL – Comparison Tests

Tags: American, Chevrolet, Chevrolet Cruze, economy, Ford, Ford Focus, Hyundai, Hyundai Elantra, Japanese, Korean, Mazda, Mazda 3, performance testing, sedan, Volkswagen, Volkswagen Jetta |


View the original article here

2012 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 / ZR1 – Car News

April 28, 2011 at 9:37pm by Steve Siler

2012 Chevrolet Corvette Centennial Edition

Grippier tires and—finally!—grippier seats mark the C6’s last full year of production.

Regular (and even irregular) readers already know this, so for those who are unfamiliar with this institution, an introduction: Hi, we’re Car and Driver, and we hate the seats in the Corvette. Today, Chevy’s plastic fantastic isn’t so much a sports car as it is a budget supercar. But, in our every encounter with it, we come away just as appalled at its seats as we are amazed at its capabilities.

Keep Reading: 2012 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 / ZR1 – Car News

Tags: American, Chevrolet, Chevrolet Corvette, Chevrolet Corvette Z06, Chevrolet Corvette ZR1, coupe, sports car, supercharged |


View the original article here

Saturday, May 7, 2011

For Earth Day, we push the Chevrolet Volt to its limits--and beyond:

By BOB GRITZINGER on 4/22/2011

A lot has been written about the General Motors' green darling, the 2011 Chevrolet Volt--it's been poked, prodded and picked apart by every automotive pundit on the planet.

But up to this point, most of the stories about the Volt have been based on drives conducted under the watchful and overprotective eye of the General. Individual consumers' impressions have been largely colored by their pride of ownership and their righteous zeal to wring the maximum level of efficiency from their shiny electric chariots.

Now, with 2,000 Volts built since last December's start of production, and 1,000 in consumer's driveways in seven states, a pretty red Volt landed in our test fleet for some real-world driving. We decided to push the limits, steadily driving for a day up Michigan's mitten and back.

For an added twist, we tossed an empty gas can in the hatchback (hermetically sealed in a trash bag) with the deliberate intention of running our Volt out of fuel. GM told us we wouldn't hurt the car, and that in fact, we'd get a pleasant surprise of a few extra battery miles once the on-board gasoline generator went tango uniform.

putting gas in the Chevy Volt.
A bit of gas gets the Volt back on the road after we intentionally ran down the fuel tank and the battery pack.

Sure enough, when the Volt ran out of its 9.3 gallons of premium fuel, the gasoline-powered generator shut down, the instruments issued warnings, but the speedometer never wavered from 70 mph as the car immediately tapped into the battery for extra power. Think of it as an electric "reserve" tank, designed to provide an extra three or four miles of range if you run out of gas. About three miles later, we ran low on reserve battery power and safely slowed to a stop on the shoulder of the road.

We sent a chase car for gas, poured in two gallons on the roadside, turned the key, and we were on our way again. The generator ran at maximum capacity for the next three miles to replenish the battery before the powertrain settled back into normal operating mode. Very little drama.

On our one-day adventure, we posted 36.5 mpg, including the initial 26 miles on battery power alone, over a 560-mile trip.

Our little experiment showed us that while Chevy's little electric sedan might seem like a pricey science project, for us it's earned its real-world stripes.

2011 Chevrolet Volt

On Sale: Now in seven states, 50 by year end

Base Price: $41,000

Drivetrain: 111-kilowatt, 149-hp, 273-lb-ft electric motor, 1.4-liter, 84-hp I4; FWD

Curb Weight: 3,781 lb

Fuel Economy: 93 mpg-e all electric/37 mpg gas only/60 mpg-e combined composite


AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Critique statements or articles, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. Above all, be respectful. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Email moderator@autoweek.com

View the original article here

2011 Chevrolet Equinox 2LT, an AW Drivers Log:

EXECUTIVE EDITOR--AUTOWEEK.COM BOB GRITZINGER: Here's a car that clearly needs more power for its size, but if fuel economy becomes your most important concern, it'll certainly do. The vehicle just feels heavy overall, drives sluggishly, and the underpowered four-cylinder only adds to that impression.

It's too bad, because overall the vehicle is very nicely appointed, sharply styled and well-equipped. I like the interior layout and the quality materials, though the seat seemed a little stiff for my taste. Some of the blue-on-metallic lettering can also be hard to see in certain lighting conditions.

If you can't or don't want to jump up to the V6 and maybe even AWD, this Equinox is a nice place to be. It's just not the best driver in the class.

ASSOCIATE EDITOR JONATHAN WONG: I'll have to echo Bob's call for more power in this 2011 Chevrolet Equinox, which is conveniently available in the upgraded V6 engine option. Chevy has been making a big deal about this direct-injection four-cylinder with an EPA highway fuel-economy rating at 32 mpg, which is impressive for sure, but it doesn't pack the punch needed to move this larger, small crossover around. And just to think, this is the front-wheel-drive version (which still weighs in at nearly 3,800 pounds!) and not a heavier all-wheel-drive example.

For quick launches or passing maneuvers which require heavy throttle, the engine does seem overly loud. However, at steady cruising with the active noise-cancellation system, I have no complaints. My only other nitpick involves the steering, which is too light and disconnected-feeling for my tastes.

Besides those two quibbles, the rest of the Equinox is quite nice, especially if you can remember the previous model, which was a middle-of-the-pack small crossover at best. The current model has nice, clean looks with Chevy's company grille up front and a much improved interior built from better materials.

As I said, this is a bigger small crossover, and that's especially clear with the massive rear-door openings to make ingress and egress for rear passengers that much easier.

Overall, Chevy has a more than respectable small crossover combatant on its hands, especially for those who need a touch more room than the class-ruling Honda CR-V or the Toyota RAV 4.

2011 Chevrolet Equinox 2LT

Base Price: $26,715

As-Tested Price: $29,305

Drivetrain: 2.4-liter I4; FWD, six-speed automatic

Output: 182 hp @ 6,700 rpm, 172 lb-ft @ 4,900 rpm

Curb Weight: 3,770 lb

Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 26/23.0 mpg

Options: Audio system and rear-seat entertainment including AM/FM/satellite with CD/DVD, radio data system, auxiliary jack, rear-seat dual-screen DVD, remote, two headsets ($1,295); leather-appointed seats ($800); power programmable liftgate ($495)


AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Critique statements or articles, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. Above all, be respectful. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Email moderator@autoweek.com

View the original article here