Your Ad Here
Showing posts with label Turbo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Turbo. Show all posts

Thursday, July 14, 2011

2012 Porsche Panamera Turbo S First Drive: Consider Us Duly Impressed

2012 Porsche Panamera Turbo S First Drive – Review – Car and Driver #pallet {margin:0;}#echoice li.category {margin:0;}Car and DriverIntelligence. Independence. Irreverence. VehiclesReviewsNewsFeaturesBuyer's GuideFollow UsSubscribeSearch Car and DriverHome › Reviews › 2012 Porsche Panamera Turbo S - First Drive Review

Shopping Tools

Advertisement

2012 Porsche Panamera Turbo S - First Drive ReviewPorsche launches the ultimate Panamera, and we are duly impressed.BY JENS MEINERS
June 2011

Pages:1Photos

2012 Porsche Panamera Turbo S

Photos (36)Visit Our Buyer's Guide »Porsche Panamera› Overview› Specifications› Price with Options› Photos & 360° View› Get a Free QuoteNews & Reviews2012 Porsche Panamera S Hybrid - First Drive Review2012 Porsche Panamera Turbo S - Auto Shows2012 Porsche Panamera S Hybrid Official Photos and Info - Auto Shows2011 Porsche Panamera 4 - Short Take Road Test2010 Porsche Panamera S - Quick Test2011 Porsche Panamera / Panamera 4 - First Drive Review2011 Porsche Panamera / Panamera 4 - Official Photos and Info2010 Porsche Panamera's Dynamic Rear Wing - Tech Dept.2010 Porsche Panamera Turbo - Road TestTop CompetitorsBMW Alpina B7Bentley Continental Flying Spur SpeedJaguar XJ / XJL Supercharged and XJ / XJL SupersportMercedes-Benz S65 AMG

It's not that any Porsche Panamera lacks power. The 300-hp V-6 is quick, the 380-hp hybrid and the 400-hp V-8 are quicker still, and the 500-hp Turbo—well, let’s just say we’ve squeezed a 3.3-second 0-to-60 run out of that 4400-pound rocket. But this is Porsche, and where a Turbo exists, a Turbo S isn’t far behind. So here is the Panamera Turbo S, more powerful by 50 hp thanks to a modified ECU, and more responsive thanks to modified turbochargers with titanium-aluminum turbine blades. The basic design of the Turbo model’s twin-turbocharged 4.8-liter V-8 remains unchanged.

The difference is not insignificant: While the Panamera Turbo makes 516 lb-ft of torque in regular trim, the Turbo S provides up to 553 lb-ft—or 590 with an overboost function. We estimate a 0-to-60-mph time of three seconds flat, while Porsche’s stated top speed rises by two mph to 190. There is just one transmission: the excellent PDK, a ZF-sourced seven-speed dual-clutch automatic. It routes power to all four wheels, with a noticeable bias towards the rearmost pair.

Germans Have All the Fun

Few Panamera owners are as fortunate as those on its German home turf, where it is legal to take it up to its top speed, so, unless you like jail—and what Porsche owner with 175 large lying around doesn’t—you’ll have to take our word for the ultra-high-speed performance of this car. At virtually any velocity, this quickest of the four-door Porsches will charge forward with a menacing growl. It’s unlike, say, the Mercedes-Benz S600 or the BMW 760i, in which speed builds in surreal silence, and it doesn't take a very long stretch of road to max it out. That’s not to say it’s a white-knuckle affair; the Panamera Turbo S masks actual speed very well, and 120 mph feels like 70. Remarkably, however, the Panamera might be even more efficient at killing speed than building it up, especially when equipped with the optional carbon-ceramic brakes, which bite instantly and aggressively.

Still, by definition and by its somewhat clumsy styling, the Panamera is not a sports car, and this four-door hatchback sedan tips the scales at well over two tons. Thankfully, the chassis does a far better job of masking the Panamera's size and mass than does its chubby sheetmetal. The hydraulic steering is nicely weighted and provides linear feedback. Among luxury liners, the Panamera is clearly the best-handling, with impeccable stability and precise turn-in despite having to swing around the heavy V-8 and its turbo accouterments. The torque-vectoring system included with the standard Porsche Dynamic Chassis Control basically forces the Panamera into corners, and makes it virtually impossible to throw the car off course with anything less than wildly exaggerated inputs and insane entry speeds. The car is ever-vigilant for that stuff, though: It’s impossible to turn off the stability-control system entirely, even if the button labeled “off” suggests otherwise. If the car is out of sorts and you tap the brakes, the system always kicks in.

Beautiful Inside, At Least

As in other Panameras, the Turbo S’s front- and rear-seat room is adequate for its class of short-wheelbase luxury cars, and the tall center console front and rear is nicely styled and looks expensive and tasteful. Being sealed inside would be a flawless experience if not for the occasional creak and a few joints and seams that aren’t up to, say, Audi standards.

Even though it includes many of the $136K Turbo’s performance options as standard, at $174,175, the Panamera Turbo S doesn’t exactly represent a great value. Plus, the non-S Turbo can be upgraded to 540 hp and the same 553 lb-ft of torque with a $21,730 power package that includes the modified turbos. But the less-expensive car doesn't have the Turbo S’s available exclusive color schemes and other cosmetic goodies—the most notable, of course, being the badge.

Specifications

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 5-door hatchback

BASE PRICE: $174,175

ENGINE TYPE: twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injection

Displacement: 293 cu in, 4806 cc
Power (SAE net): 550 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 590 lb-ft @ 2250 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 115.0 in Length: 195.7 in
Width: 76.0 in Height: 54.8 in
Curb weight (C/D est): 4450 lb
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 3.0 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 11.4 sec
Top speed (mfr’s claim): 190 mph

FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST):
EPA city/highway driving: 15/23 mpg

 
Shell

Subscribe to Car and Driver magazine

Pages:1Photos

Stumble ItCommentsJoin the Discussion

Related Stories »2010 Porsche Panamera Turbo - Road Test24 Hours of Dayton: 500 horsepower! One waffle house! Four red-eyed drivers! 1078 miles of frightened motorists! Way too much of Dayton! Seven speeds and two clutches! No one following any rules!

2011 Porsche Panamera 4 - Short Take Road TestThe V6 Panamera may have two fewer cylinders but doesn’t skimp on much else.

2010 Aston Martin Rapide vs. 2010 Porsche Panamera Turbo - Comparison TestsThe Color of Real Money: Maximum speed meets maximum elegance. With seating for four, no waiting.

WTF Cars: Six New Brand-Benders - FeatureWe prognosticate on six cars that take their family trees in new directions.

2012 Porsche Panamera Turbo S - Auto ShowsPorsche applies the go-fast formula to its top-spec sedan.

Porsche Panamera S vs. BMW 750i, Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S - Comparison TestsStimulus Packages: The startling new Porsche sedan goes toe-to-toe with a glamourous Italian and a businesslike German.

Car and Driver Video »CD VideoThis Month in Car and Driver »In This Months Issue of Car and Driver DirectoryM Local Guides Subscribe Vehicles Trucks, SUVs, & Vans Sporty & Fun Sedans & Wagons Luxury Budget & Green Editor's Choice Most Researched Reviews In the Magazine From the Archives Comparison Tests Road Tests First Drives News Auto Shows Spy Photos Car News Car and Driver Blog Features Gear Box Interviews Tech Department Sport Awards Columns Features Buyer's Guide Editor's Choice: Trucks, SUVs, & Vans Editor's Choice: Sporty & Fun Editor's Choice: Sedans & Wagons Editor's Choice: Luxury Editor's Choice: Budget & Green Follow us Car and Driver RSS Car and Driver on Twitter Car and Driver on YouTube Car and Driver on Facebook Backfires Subscribe Mobile Digital Edition Newsletter Subscriptions Sitemap Contact Us Browse Cars for Sale Subscriptions/Customer Service Website Feedback Best Cars Luxury Cars Sports Cars Trucks Hybrids YouTube Twitter FacebookHFMU.S. Mens Network

Visit other Hachette Filipacchi sites:

Cycle World ELLE ELLEgirl ELLE DECOR Glo Premiere Road & Track Woman's DayCopyright ©2010 Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., Inc., Terms & Conditions Privacy-Your Privacy Rights


View the original article here

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Tested: The 2011 Kia Sportage SX Turbo is the Quickest Kia Ever

2011 Kia Sportage SX Turbo AWD Road Test - Review - Car and Driver #pallet {margin:0;}#echoice li.category {margin:0;}Car and DriverIntelligence. Independence. Irreverence. VehiclesReviewsNewsFeaturesBuyer's GuideFollow UsSubscribeSearch Car and DriverHome › Reviews › 2011 Kia Sportage SX Turbo AWD - Short Take Road Test

Shopping Tools

Advertisement

2011 Kia Sportage SX Turbo AWD - Short Take Road TestEven sportagier.BY DAVID GLUCKMAN, PHOTOGRAPHY BY MARC URBANO
June 2011

Pages:1Photos

2011 Kia Sportage SX Turbo AWD

Photos (12)Highs and Lows

Highs:Turbocharged performance befitting something with two fewer doors, not-me-too styling.

Lows:Turbo is only available with all the fixin’s; firm suspension, firmer price.

Visit Our Buyer's Guide »Kia Sportage› Overview› Specifications› Price with Options› Photos & 360° View› Get a Free QuoteNews & Reviews2011 Kia Sportage EX FWD - Short Take Road Test2011 Kia Sportage - Short Take Road Test2011 Kia Sportage - Official Photos and InfoKia Sportage EX 4WD - Road TestKia Sportage - Auto ShowsTop CompetitorsHonda CR-VNissan RogueSubaru ForesterSuzuki Grand VitaraToyota RAV4DownloadsTest Sheet

That Kia continues to assemble ever-better-performing, more-competitive, more-attractive products should be news to no one. That a small crossover is the Korean brand’s quickest vehicle might take you by surprise. It did us. But it’s true: Since the 1994 Sephia landed stateside, no Kia has hit 60 mph in fewer ticks of the second hand than this new turbocharged Sportage.

A midyear addition to the lineup, the SX gives the otherwise competent Sportage that which it lacked: haste. Its 260-hp, 2.0-liter direct-injected turbo four is a detuned version of the one available in the Optima. With optional all-wheel drive dispersing 269 pound-feet of torque, the Sportage reaches 60 in 6.1 seconds. It’s quicker to that mark—by 2.8 seconds—than a 170-hp, 2.4-liter Sportage with all-wheel drive. Quicker, by 0.3 second, than the lighter, 274-hp Optima SX sedan.

None of the Kia’s all-wheel-drive little-ute peers is as fleet, including the segment’s former top sprinter, the Toyota RAV4.

All turbocharged Sportages come with a six-speed automatic transmission. Its quick, smooth actions help the crossover live up to the first five letters of its name without sacrificing comfort.

Unfortunately, Kia is making a bad habit of exclusively pairing the engine we prefer with a “sport-tuned” suspension. Even though no stiffening of the already firm setup was ?warranted, Kia tightened the ­calibrations anyway. The SX’s suspension is composed but not compliant.

What you get for $4500 in interior options: nav, upgraded audio, leather, heated seats, a backup warning system, and a giant sunroof.

Dual exhaust outlets, a barely scrutable T-GDI badge—that’s “turbocharged gasoline direct injection,” for the faint of scruting—and a less chrome-y grille are the only turbo identifiers on the exterior. Sportages in SX trim come with everything from the formerly top-spec EX, adding $2500 to the sticker for the stiff ride and the stout engine. At a base price of $27,990 for an AWD version, it’s more than a bit expensive. Our test vehicle arrived loaded with the $1500 Navigation option, which includes an upgraded audio system, and the $3000 Premium package (leather upholstery, heated seats, a backup warning system, a panoramic sunroof, a fan-cooled driver’s seat, and more). Throw in a $75 cargo mat, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money ($32,565, specifically). Expensive, yes, but the SX is sufficiently sportaged.

Just think if Kia were to try its increasingly deft hand at a proper sports car.

Specifications

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 5-door wagon

PRICE AS TESTED: $32,565 (base price: $27,990)

ENGINE TYPE: turbocharged DOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection

Displacement: 122 cu in, 1998
Power (SAE net): 260 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 269 lb-ft @ 1850 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 6-speed automatic with manual shifting mode

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 103.9 in Length: 175.2 in
Width: 73.0 in Height: 64.4 in
Curb weight: 3642 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 6.1 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 16.1 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 37.7 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 6.6 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 14.7 sec @ 96 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 132 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 173 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.80 g

FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city/highway driving: 21/25 mpg
C/D observed: 21 mpg

TEST NOTES: As with the turbo Sonata, a brake-torque launch yields much slower acceleration times. Simply mashing the gas gets quicker numbers.

 
Shell

Subscribe to Car and Driver magazine

Pages:1Photos

Stumble ItYahoo! BuzzCommentsJoin the Discussion

Related Stories »2011 Kia Optima SX Turbo - Short Take Road TestAmong the best family sedans to drive—and, yes, it’s a Kia.

2011 Kia Sportage EX FWD - Short Take Road TestA sporty chassis backs up the sporty looks and badge, but we’re looking forward to the upcoming turbo model.

July 2011 - Table of ContentsThe magazine's stories are just a click away...

Ford Escape vs. Honda CR-V, Hyundai Santa Fe, Jeep Cherokee, and Seven More Compact SUVs - Comparison TestsWhite Snow and the 11 Dwarfs: We round up all the teeny SUVs and dispatch them into the deep Cool Whip.

Terrain vs. CR-V, RAV4, Tiguan, Mariner, Outlander, Forester, Grand Vitara - Comparison TestsThe (Just) O.K. Corral: We gallop through Bluegrass Country, exercising eight SUVs that are not so much quarter horses as miniature ponies.

Name That Shifter, No. 23: 1998 Kia Sportage Car and Driver Video »CD VideoThis Month in Car and Driver »In This Months Issue of Car and Driver DirectoryM Local Guides Subscribe Vehicles Trucks, SUVs, & Vans Sporty & Fun Sedans & Wagons Luxury Budget & Green Editor's Choice Most Researched Reviews In the Magazine From the Archives Comparison Tests Road Tests First Drives News Auto Shows Spy Photos Car News Car and Driver Blog Features Gear Box Interviews Tech Department Sport Awards Columns Features Buyer's Guide Editor's Choice: Trucks, SUVs, & Vans Editor's Choice: Sporty & Fun Editor's Choice: Sedans & Wagons Editor's Choice: Luxury Editor's Choice: Budget & Green Follow us Car and Driver RSS Car and Driver on Twitter Car and Driver on YouTube Car and Driver on Facebook Backfires Subscribe Mobile Digital Edition Newsletter Subscriptions Sitemap Contact Us Browse Cars for Sale Subscriptions/Customer Service Website Feedback Best Cars Luxury Cars Sports Cars Trucks Hybrids YouTube Twitter FacebookHFMU.S. Mens Network

Visit other Hachette Filipacchi sites:

Cycle World ELLE ELLEgirl ELLE DECOR Glo Premiere Road & Track Woman's DayCopyright ©2010 Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., Inc., Terms & Conditions Privacy-Your Privacy Rights


View the original article here

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Ford Announces 1.0-Liter Turbo Three-Cylinder EcoBoost for U.S.-Market Fiesta (Maybe Focus, Too)

June 2, 2011 at 10:50am by Justin Berkowitz and Erik Johnson

2011 Ford Fiesta

Ford just announced plans for a direct-injected, turbocharged 1.0-liter three-cylinder EcoBoost engine, joining BMW among major automakers who intend to offer such a powerplant. The Blue Oval says that the tiny mill will find its way into U.S.-market Fiestas, with availability possibly expanding to the Focus, too. No word as of yet on whether the C-Max mini-minivan, a platform mate of the Focus, will get the three.

A broad torque curve is promised, as is performance on par with the Fiesta’s current naturally aspirated 1.6-liter four, which makes 120 hp and 112 lb-ft. The new engine—we’re told it’s an all-new block, not just a chopped-down four—weighs some 20 pounds less than the 1.6, and will feature an integrated cylinder head and exhaust manifold, which is intended to give the engine a wider power band, and optimum fueling throughout the RPM range. Included with the new engine is a split cooling system, meant to minimize warm-up times, as well as a friction-reducing offset crankshaft.

Ford promises that the three will replace a four-cylinder engine in its U.S. powertrain portfolio—we’re guessing the aforementioned 1.6-liter four that’s in today’s Fiesta is on the chopping block—and that the little three pot will debut at this fall’s Frankfurt auto show.

With the introduction of the triple, Ford says it will offer an EcoBoost option for 90 percent of the models it sells in the U.S. by 2013. The 1.0-liter engine will be the lowest-displacement engine Ford has ever put into production. While we like the general info we’ve heard so far, the 1.0 had better be darn good if it’s going to convince Americans that three-cylinders and a single liter is sufficient for our highways. At the very least, Rod Farva will be happy with his liter-a-motor.

Tags: EcoBoost, engines, Ford, Ford Fiesta, three-cylinder, turbocharged |


View the original article here

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Mercedes-Benz Definitely Planning A-class AMG, 300-Plus-HP Turbo Four Possible

April 26, 2011 at 11:33am by Justin Berkowitz

It’s not just twin-turbocharged V-12s that demonstrate the hunger for power that gnaws at AMG engineers—it’s also the way Mercedes-Benz’s performance sub-brand massages virtually everything the company makes. Even the Geländewagen and its humble, militarized 1970s-era architecture is turned into the G55 AMG. With Benz’s A-class concept presaging a production model, we’ve received confirmation from Mercedes insiders that it, too, will be treated to a trip to the AMG spa.
The upcoming third-gen A-class—which we recently reported will be sold in the U.S. in sedan, crossover, and three- and five-door hatch forms—will be the first ever A to get the treatment. (Word is that executives didn’t think the wobbly econobox deserved an AMG badge in the past.) We expect the engine will be a highly tuned four cylinder. It’ll likely spring from the same family of four-bangers as the 2.0-liter found in the concept’s engine bay, and should make substantially over 300 hp with the aid of forced induction.
Although the new A-class will, like the first two generations, utilize front-wheel drive, Merc’s engineers have told us that the platform is being prepared for all-wheel drive; we expect that layout to be exploited in most performance models to banish any worries about torque steer. Given the sad reality that AMG has never built a volume production model with a manual gearbox, you can bank mortgage money on the A-class AMG having a strictly two-pedal setup. That said, we’d be surprised if it weren’t a dual-clutch automatic.
Answering the two most prominent questions that surround the new A-class—”When?” and “How much?”—is even more of a fool’s errand with respect to the AMG version. The simple answer is that we anticipate the AMG A-class to come at least a year after the regular A does, and that it will cost significantly more. Think about the premium commanded by the BMW 1-series M and you’ll probably be on the right track. You didn’t think a new Mercedes-Benz would be cheap, did you?
Tags: AMG, Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-Benz A-class, Mercedes-Benz A-class AMG |
View the original article here